Welcome back — jump to Tutorials, Support & Docs, or What’s New. Go to PlatformNot you?Log out
Platform AI Agents Customers Developer Docs Services Company Careers Blog Resources Comparisons Buyer's Guide Integrations Use Cases Tutorials Events LLM-first app SaaS platform Book a Demo
2026 B2B Paid Media Benchmark Report

What $57.6M of B2B ad spend actually delivered

Aggregated and anonymized results from 150+ B2B advertisers across LinkedIn, Meta, Google Ads and Reddit — 171,000 leads tracked all the way to closed-won revenue. No email gate. Filter it yourself below.

$57.6M2025 ad spend analyzed
171,000leads generated
$45.8Mdirectly-attributed closed-won revenue
64.2%close rate on ad-triggered opportunities
Tactical: CPL, formats and channels — for the people running the campaigns.
Strategic: pipeline ROI, CAC and close rates — for the people defending the budget.

Retargeting looks fine on cost per lead…

…and collapses when you follow the revenue

The same dataset, read two ways. This is why the report ships with a toggle: the metric you optimize decides the strategy you believe in. Flip the lens and watch the winner change.

Prospecting

Metadata-built audiences · 115 advertisers
Cost per lead$208
Cost per click$4.38
Closed-won revenue per $1 spent2.88x
Customer acquisition cost$5,569
Close rate on triggered opps74.0%

Retargeting

All channels · 91 advertisers
Cost per lead$196
Cost per click$6.55
Closed-won revenue per $1 spent0.94x
Customer acquisition cost$26,682
Close rate on triggered opps59.0%
On cost per lead, retargeting and prospecting are within 6% of each other. If CPL is your scoreboard, retargeting looks like a safe place to park budget.
On pipeline, the picture inverts: a prospecting dollar returned 3x more directly-attributed closed-won revenue, at roughly one-fifth the acquisition cost. Cheap leads are not the same thing as cheap customers.

Tactical benchmarks: where the efficiency hides

Every number below is computed from lead-generation campaigns in the dataset — the same pipeline that powers the explorer. Full playbook in the tactical deep-dive.

Channel economics: expensive clicks can be cheap leads

LinkedIn clicks cost 3.1x more than Facebook — but convert at 2.3x the rate. The per-lead gap is far smaller than the per-click gap suggests.

$202LinkedIn CPL
$145Facebook CPL
$138Instagram CPL
5.9% vs 2.6%LinkedIn vs Facebook conversion rate

On LinkedIn, Lead Gen Forms cut CPL 44%

Sending LinkedIn traffic to a landing page nearly doubled cost per lead. On Meta, the form-versus-landing-page gap all but disappears — keep the landing page and the intent data it gives you.

$193LinkedIn CPL, Lead Gen Form
$346LinkedIn CPL, landing page

Document ads are LinkedIn's efficiency king

Cheapest cost per lead of any major LinkedIn format, with a conversion rate roughly double the platform average.

$142Document CPL
$200Image CPL
$265Video CPL
11.9%Document conversion rate

The retargeting split: maximize Meta, cap LinkedIn

Facebook retargeting delivers leads 28% cheaper than Facebook prospecting. On LinkedIn the trap springs the other way: retargeting runs at a 21% premium as small pools fatigue.

$120 vs $166Facebook: retargeting vs prospecting CPL
$234 vs $194LinkedIn: retargeting vs prospecting CPL
Read the tactical deep-dive: formats, destinations and the retargeting fix →

Strategic benchmarks: CPL is a liar

$31.5M of lead-generation spend, 171,000 leads, tracked into CRM revenue. Directly-attributed ("triggered") and influenced pipeline tell a different story than lead costs do.

The pipeline hierarchy

Every lead-gen dollar directly triggered $1.45 of closed-won revenue and influenced far more. When ads create the opportunity, it closes at 64.2% — the bottleneck is creating the right opportunities, not closing them.

1.45xtriggered closed-won per $1
31.4xinfluenced closed-won per $1
64.2%close rate, triggered opps

The audience reversal

Retargeting wins the CPL beauty contest and loses the revenue war: prospecting returned 3x the triggered ROI at roughly one-fifth the CAC.

2.88x vs 0.94xprospecting vs retargeting triggered ROI
$5,569 vs $26,682prospecting vs retargeting CAC

Document ads dominate both lenses

The one recommendation the tactical and strategic reads agree on: cheapest leads on LinkedIn and the strongest pipeline economics of any format.

3.83xDocument triggered ROI
$6,498Document CAC
1.31x / $13,185Image ROI / CAC

Video is an awareness tool, not a pipeline tool

Video returned $0.24 of triggered closed-won revenue per dollar — the weakest of any format — with a CAC north of $33,000. Use it to build demand, not to harvest it.

0.24xVideo triggered ROI
$33,762Video CAC
$63,859Conversation ads CAC
Read the strategic deep-dive: triggered vs influenced, audiences and formats →

Explore the benchmarks

Filter $57.6M of spend by company size, industry, channel, ad type and campaign goal. Every view has a shareable URL. Segments that would aggregate fewer than 5 advertisers are suppressed to protect anonymity.

Loading benchmark data…

Lead metrics (CPL, conversion rate) are computed across lead-generation campaigns; delivery metrics (CPM, CPC, CTR) across all campaigns in the segment. Pipeline metrics cover the $31.5M lead-gen subset with CRM attribution. Full methodology.

Take the whole report with you

No forms, no gate. Share it, cite it, forward it to whoever owns the budget.

The full report (PDF)

Key findings, both deep-dives and the methodology in one document — built from the same verified data pipeline as this page.

Download the PDF

Tactical deep-dive

For the people running campaigns: destinations by channel, the format playbook, and the three-step fix for LinkedIn retargeting fatigue.

Read part 1

Strategic deep-dive

For the people defending budgets: triggered vs influenced revenue, the audience reversal, and where direct-response budgets go to die.

Read part 2

Methodology & anonymization

What's in the data. $57.6M of 2025 B2B advertising spend from 150+ Metadata customer ad accounts across LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, Google Ads and Reddit, spanning 171,000 generated leads. Pipeline metrics cover the $31.5M subset of lead-generation campaigns with CRM opportunity attribution.

Triggered vs influenced. "Triggered" revenue is attributed only when the ad-generated lead directly created the opportunity. "Influenced" counts opportunities the campaign touched anywhere in the journey. Triggered is the conservative number; influenced is the ceiling.

How metrics are computed. All metrics are spend-weighted aggregates recomputed from raw totals (e.g. CPL = total spend ÷ total leads), never averages of averages. CPL and conversion rate are computed across lead-generation-objective campaigns; CPM, CPC and CTR across all campaigns in a segment.

Anonymization. Every published segment aggregates at least 5 distinct advertisers and $50,000 of spend, with no single advertiser contributing more than 50% of segment spend. Pipeline metrics additionally require at least 3 closed-won opportunities. Only rounded ratio metrics are published — never per-account values or absolute segment totals. Segments below these thresholds are suppressed entirely (1,724 of 2,132 possible tactical segments and 944 of 1,094 strategic segments in this edition). An automated test attempts to isolate individual advertisers on every build and blocks publication if it succeeds.

Repeatability. This report is regenerated annually from the same pipeline. 2025 spend, generated 2026.

Want your numbers benchmarked against this dataset?

Metadata runs paid campaigns for 150+ B2B companies. Book a demo and we'll show you where your CPL, CAC and pipeline ROI sit against these benchmarks — and what to change.

Book a Demo